* Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:28]: > Could I obtain some direction from the release team? > > Will you allow the exiv2 library transition to go forward or would you like > me > to revert the version of digikam in unstable/ etch? > > Or is there some other option available?
Sorry for not speaking earlier, but we are currently quite busy with lots of requests coming to us. > I see two options. > > 1. Take the library transition of exiv2 forward, or > > 2. Revert the version of digikam in etch to 0.8 via an epoc upload to > unstable which doesn't have this issue as it doesn't use exiv2. > > I'm pretty happy with either option, but understand you maybe looking at a > greater picture. I tried to get some more input. My basic assumption even a week ago was "please no library changes anymore unless absolutly necessary", but I tried to get a second opinion on that: 13:15 <aba> ana: do you have any opinion on the exiv2-upgrade? 14:33 <ana> aba: i am aware of the problem with digikam (and another pkg-kde-extras packages), but i do not think it is the best time to upgrade the library So, I think it is better to revert digikam now. (Yes, this is one of the times where I'm actually a bit too nice to really say hard "No way to upgrade the library" - I would rather prefer to have all the updates in, but I know that it would have an bad effect on Etch, so I still refuse it.) Sorry for the late response. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
