Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:08:22AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Nicolas Boullis wrote: >>> Cheers, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:03:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>>> If you are sure that there are no API changes, then please upload to >>>> unstable and tell us when you did so we can schedule binNMUs (as it does >>>> not seem to interfere with existing transitions). >>> I just played with diff over the header files and... unfortunately, >>> there are some API changes. A few functions were removed (I guess nobody >>> used them anyway), added (that should be no problem) or even changed >>> (only one function, that had its return changed from int to an enum, >>> which should be safe). >>> >>> Is it alright anyway? Or would you prefer to check if everything's >>> alright with bin-NMUs to experimental? >> Just manually checking the builds of all reverse build dependencies with >> the new version on one arch would also be fine. > > I checked all the packages that build-depend against libcdio-dev, > libiso9660-dev, libudf-dev, libcdio-cdda-dev or libcdio-paranoia-dev, > and all could be built without changing anything. > > Hence, I just uploaded libcdio 0.81-4 to unstable (I uploaded packages > for i386, powerpc and sparc). Now, I think you can schedule binNMUs.
Scheduled. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org