Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> (11/07/2009): >> Jérémy Bobbio wrote: >>> Hi mighty members of the release team, >>> >>> Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against >>> libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps? >> Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why >> this would be needed? > > From silc-toolkit_1.1.9-1/changelog: > | * libsilc and libsilcclient are now shipped in two different binary > packages > | in order to respect their SONAMEs. The -dev package depends on both > and > | has been renamed to libsilc-dev. > > libpurple0 (from src:pidgin) depends on one of them. I guess a rebuild > would update that dependency; given that silc_client_* symbols come from > the libsilcclient-1.1.3 binary, a dependency against that one is going > to be added.
The strange thing is that the soname of libsilc did not change, though as there are only a small number of reverse dependencies, I've scheduled binNMUs for them. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org