On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> (11/07/2009): > > Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > > Hi mighty members of the release team, > > > > > > Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against > > > libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps? > > > > Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why > > this would be needed? > > From silc-toolkit_1.1.9-1/changelog: > | * libsilc and libsilcclient are now shipped in two different binary > packages > | in order to respect their SONAMEs. The -dev package depends on both > and > | has been renamed to libsilc-dev. > > libpurple0 (from src:pidgin) depends on one of them. I guess a rebuild > would update that dependency; given that silc_client_* symbols come from > the libsilcclient-1.1.3 binary, a dependency against that one is going > to be added. > > FWIW, silc-toolkit is uploaded, but not installed, on amd64. Cc'ing > amd64 buildd admins for that matter.
I gave back silc-toolkit. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org