Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Bill Allombert wrote: >>> libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility. >> Can you point me to the section that points to that need? > > http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Desktop-generic/LSB-Desktop-generic/libjpeg62.html#LIBJPEG > > It's the same in LSB 4.0.
So libjpeg62 has to be remained, though libjpeg62-dev does not have to stay and could be provided by libjpeg8-dev like I proposed from the start. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
