On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 19:44:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Bill Allombert wrote: > >> > >> libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility. > > > > Can you point me to the section that points to that need? > > http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Desktop-generic/LSB-Desktop-generic/libjpeg62.html#LIBJPEG > > It's the same in LSB 4.0. > Doesn't that allow us to keep libjpeg62 but get rid of libjpeg62-dev?
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
