Am 22.09.2010 18:41, Julien Cristau schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:33:45 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote: > >> Am 22.09.2010 15:27, Julien Cristau schrieb: >>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:19:11 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote: >>> >>>> Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb: >>>>> So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're >>>>> shipping motif because some closed apps need it. How does that work if >>>>> we get rid of libXm.so.3? Or did I misunderstand the point of those >>>>> packages? >>>> Apps have to be recompiled if the users decide to replace libXm.so.3 >>>> by libXm.so.4 >>>> >>> That's not an option for closed apps. And open apps should be using >>> lesstif anyway. >> IIRC closed aps like the citrix client are dynamically linked >> against libXm.so and since almost a year, 2.3 of openmotif is >> required for citrix ica client. >> > What about older apps that need libXm.so.3?
What kind of discussion is this here? I thought it would be an advantage to have a recent openmotif in the next stable version. It's up to you if you unblock it or not. If you would like to keep libXm.so.3 - create a report against openmotif. In the past, old versions of libXm were always redeemed by newer ones. The intention of this bugreport is something else. Stefan -- Stefan Bauer ----------------------------------------- PGP: 36D1 1570 DCAD B767 EABE F60D 6BCA 7AD4 79EB C4EC -------- plzk.de - Linux - because it works ---------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9a37ac.1060...@cubewerk.de