On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 21:20 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > My understanding was that if necessary (which given that the freeze is > > tomorrow it might be), this could be resolved without a transition by > > having gnustep-make explicitly depend on gobjc-4.6 for the wheezy cycle; > > see #676229. [...] > You are not correct that we'll have to revert the change in > gnustep-make (the dependency on gobjc-4.6). [...] > Uploading gnustep-base/1.22.1 with the libobjc4 patch will allow the > package to be built with gcc-4.7 on x86 archs, and with gcc-4.6 on the > other (where 4.6 is still the default). Thus, all GNUstep packages > that were recently built will depend on libobjc4 on x86, and on > libobjc3 on the rest of the architectures, as is expected. The patch > is ABI compatible, so no recompilation should be necessary; I can > confirm this after my runtime tests.
That would presumably be one or both of the patches from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667868#12 ? If we postponed the main transition(s) until wheezy+1, would the gnustep-base upload be the only thing required for wheezy? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341097337.8055.28.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org