On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 00:44 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > At Sun, 01 Jul 2012 00:02:17 +0100, > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 21:20 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > Uploading gnustep-base/1.22.1 with the libobjc4 patch will allow > > > the package to be built with gcc-4.7 on x86 archs, and with > > > gcc-4.6 on the other (where 4.6 is still the default). [...] The > > > patch is ABI compatible, so no recompilation should be necessary; > > > I can confirm this after my runtime tests. > > > > That would presumably be one or both of the patches from > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667868#12 ? > > Yes, both of them.
Thanks for the confirmation. > > If we postponed the main transition(s) until wheezy+1, would the > > gnustep-base upload be the only thing required for wheezy? > > Yes, it would be the only thing needed if we talk about the core > GNUstep packages (-make, -base, -gui, -back). Okay. It's really too late to be starting the transitions now I'm afraid; apologies for our part in the timing delay. Please go ahead with a -base upload including the patches mentioned above. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341353660.3769.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
