Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 13:20 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Please unblock package condor
>
> I have just made an upload of an upstream security fix release
> addressing CVE-2012-3416. I decided to upload this upstream release
> instead of cherry-picking the security fix, because this release only
> addresses this fix anyway. I'm attaching the full diff to the current
> version in wheezy. Here are the stats:
Is this issue specifically related to IPv6 addresses, or is the file in
which it's fixed a red herring?
diff -Nru condor-7.8.1~dfsg.1/src/condor_utils/ipv6_hostname.cpp
condor-7.8.2~dfsg.1/src/condor_utils/ipv6_hostname.cpp
--- condor-7.8.1~dfsg.1/src/condor_utils/ipv6_hostname.cpp 2012-06-15
06:10:28.000000000 +0000
+++ condor-7.8.2~dfsg.1/src/condor_utils/ipv6_hostname.cpp 2012-08-16
06:19:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -286,16 +286,49 @@
return ret;
}
+// will this work for ipv6?
+// 1) maybe... even probably.
+// 2) i don't care
The combination of the filename and comments is somewhat odd.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1345149800.24038.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
