Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (07 Oct 2013 08:41:17 GMT) : > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@debian.org> (2013-10-07): >> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv. >> >> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920). >> I want to solve this problem. >> Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the >> actual working. >> >> I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for >> stable-proposed-updates?
> (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing / > unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files > indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get > removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with > updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files > are actually OK? Ping? Regards, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85fvogjpow....@boum.org
