On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed
So the ben file I originally sent has a couple of annoying issues: One is that packages which recommend or suggest aren't listed at all, and neither are those which only build-depend on wxpython (e.g. ipython did, but apparently unnecessarily as the maintainer has dropped that dependency now). The other is that packages which have been updated but switched to a dependency on python-wxgtk3.0|python-wxgtk2.8 are still listed as "bad". The result of these is that the tracker no longer presents useful information - most of the listed packages are actually fixed already, but several packages needing attention aren't listed. After discussion on #debian-release, I propose the following updated version (mehdi says that bad is checked before good, so "is_good = true" means "if it isn't bad, it's good"): title = "wxpython3.0"; is_affected = (.build-depends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8") | (.depends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8") | (.recommends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8") | (.suggests ~ "python-wxgtk2.8") | (.build-depends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0") | (.depends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0") | (.recommends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0") | (.suggests ~ "python-wxgtk3.0"); is_bad = (.build-depends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8" & !(.build-depends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0")) | (.depends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8" & !(.depends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0")) | (.recommends ~ "python-wxgtk2.8" & !(.recommends ~ "python-wxgtk3.0")) | (.suggests ~ "python-wxgtk2.8" & !(.suggests ~ "python-wxgtk3.0")); is_good = true; If that looks sane to you, please can you update the tracker? Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141007214328.GA5687@gemse