On 07/10/14 23:43, Olly Betts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: forwarded -1 
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed

So the ben file I originally sent has a couple of annoying issues:

One is that packages which recommend or suggest aren't listed at all,
and neither are those which only build-depend on wxpython (e.g. ipython
did, but apparently unnecessarily as the maintainer has dropped that
dependency now).

The other is that packages which have been updated but switched to a
dependency on python-wxgtk3.0|python-wxgtk2.8 are still listed as "bad".

The result of these is that the tracker no longer presents useful
information - most of the listed packages are actually fixed already,
but several packages needing attention aren't listed.

AFAICS out of the 7 packages that are still marked as bad, there is only one false positive: gnumed-client. I have updated the tracker with your proposed new one and it shows the same packages except for gnumed-client, which is now marked as good (note however that it has wx2.8 as the first alternative so you may want to file a bug about that).

Let me know if the tracker needs further changes.

Emilio


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5437903b.6080...@debian.org

Reply via email to