On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. > >>> > >>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in > >>> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix > >>> yet). > >>> > >>> zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is too large for me to > >>> backport it as part of an NMU. > >>> > >>> Haven't heard back yet from the uwsgi team. > >> > >> Thanks for the update. > >> > >> You can make those bugs serious now as this is imminent. Let us know once > >> subversion is fixed. > > > > You can go ahead with the default switch. > > ruby-defaults migrated over the weekend. I guess the next step is dropping > ruby2.1 from the list of supported interpreters and then binNMUing the > packages > that depend on both libruby2.1 and libruby2.2, so we can get rid of ruby2.1?
Yes. Do you want to create a new transition tracker for that, or change the existing one? -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
