On 16/11/15 21:59, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>>> On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>>>> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>>>>>>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in >>>>>>>> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix >>>>>>>> yet). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is too large for me to >>>>>>>> backport it as part of an NMU. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Haven't heard back yet from the uwsgi team. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the update. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can make those bugs serious now as this is imminent. Let us know >>>>>>> once >>>>>>> subversion is fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can go ahead with the default switch. >>>>> >>>>> ruby-defaults migrated over the weekend. I guess the next step is dropping >>>>> ruby2.1 from the list of supported interpreters and then binNMUing the >>>>> packages >>>>> that depend on both libruby2.1 and libruby2.2, so we can get rid of >>>>> ruby2.1? >>>> >>>> Yes. Do you want to create a new transition tracker for that, or change >>>> the existing one? >>> >>> FTR: ruby2.1 has already been removed from the the list in the >>> ruby-defaults that just went into testing, so we can start binNMUing >>> when we have a list of packages. >> >> I can do these: >> >> emilio@tatooine:~$ grep-dctrl -s Source:Package -n -F Depends libruby2.1 >> --and >> libruby2.2 >> /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages > [...] > > looks good to me
Scheduling that. Emilio
