On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:05:25AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2016-10-20): >> >Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare >> >a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming >> >hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting >> >in unstable for the time being. >> >> Cool. > >FWIW I'll probably try not to get in the way of linux's reaching testing >due to the security fix.
OK. >> >Feel free to mention packages you want to see in testing, in case I go >> >for a conservative approach (and only hand-pick a few packages); feel >> >free to cc me explicitly to make sure I read your replies. >> >> We should definitely get a newer debootstrap in before the release. >> Nothing else really comes to mind right now. > >ACK. For merged-/usr support as mentioned in Ansgar's mail I suppose? Or >do you have other things in mind? That's the one I'm thinking of. Dunno if there's anything else queued up, I've been buried for the last week and haven't had a chance to look. >> Once this release is done, I'd like to get the jessie update images >> done. I think I'm there with the changes I need, but it needs: >> >> * a little more testing >> * d-i in backports >> * a list of packages to pull from backports > >Sure, but as far as I'm concerned: one step at a timeā¦ ACK, just giving an update. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich