debian-s390
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Thread
Bug#1081850: qemu-arm64: can't run busybox:arm64 on s390x: Invalid note in PT_GNU_PROPERTY
Simon McVittie
Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display
Simon McVittie
Bug#1080324: libadwaita-1: FTBFS on s390x: test_adw_bottom_sheet_align: assertion failed (adw_bottom_sheet_get_align (sheet) == 0 (+/- 0.005)): (0.0078125 == 0)
Simon McVittie
Bug#1080317: s390-tools: FTBFS: passing argument 2 of 'EVP_PKEY_meth_set_copy' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Petter Reinholdtsen
Bug#1080317: s390-tools: FTBFS: passing argument 2 of 'EVP_PKEY_meth_set_copy' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Berli Gayathri
Bug#1079546: gtk4: two css tests are failing on s390x
Jeremy Bícha
Re: Bug#1077757: gtk4: memorytexture test fails on s390x
Simon McVittie
Bug#1077551: ffmpeg: Fails to build on s390x with gcc-14
Jeremy Bícha
Bug#1077192: src:gtk4: Test regression with gtk4 4.14 in experimental on s390x
Matthias Geiger
Re: Bug#1077192: gtk4: Test regression in 4.14 on s390x: assertion failure in 3 gsk tests
Simon McVittie
Re: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Paul Gevers
Re: Bug#1076309: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Bastian Blank
Re: Bug#1076309: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Paul Gevers
Re: [s390x] lots of "User process fault: interruption code XXXX"
Paul Gevers
Bug#1074098: Add Depends: login if applicable
Chris Hofstaedtler
Processing of s390-tools_2.16.0-2.1_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
s390-tools_2.16.0-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
sysconfig_0.0.14+nmu1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Debian FTP Masters
FTBFS of package widelands, possibly linked to the handling of UTF?
Martin Quinson
How to solve "Thread.create: Resource temporarily unavailable" ?
julien . puydt
Processing of sysconfig_0.0.14+nmu1_source.changes
Debian FTP Masters
Z training by IBM for the Linux community (next Tuesday, 30th April 2024)
Sarah Julia Kriesch
Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Andrius Merkys
Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Steven Robbins
Bug#1068509: liferea: autopkgtest on s390x suggests liferea is partially broken there
Paul Gevers
Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Patrick Franz <delta...@debian.org>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1)
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Bug#1068119: s390-tools: FTBFS: ../../include/boot/s390.h:418:17: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘void[0]’ [-Werror=array-bounds=]
Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1068119: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Steffen Eiden
Bug#1068119: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Processed: Re: Solution for 1068119 - compile error for s390-tools 2.16.0-2
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#1068119: marked as done (s390-tools: FTBFS: ../../include/boot/s390.h:418:17: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘void[0]’ [-Werror=array-bounds=])
Debian Bug Tracking System
bug 1064423: src:gnome-keyring: FTBFS on s390x
Paul Gevers
Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms
Thorsten Glaser
Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc
Thorsten Glaser
python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Jérémy Lal
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Jérémy Lal
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Thorsten Glaser
Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports
Helge Deller
Bug#1064548: tracker-miners: bmp-basic-1 test fails on big-endian
Jeremy Bícha
Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Guillem Jover
Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Bastian Germann
Bug#1063647: marked as done (sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes
Simon McVittie
s390x qemu support in autopkgtest?
Paul Gevers
Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed
Simon McVittie
Bug#1057782: gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: memorytexture test fails
Simon McVittie
Bug#1057203: r-bioc-rhdf5filters: missing build-dependency on big-endian architectures
Graham Inggs
help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Rene Engelhard
Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el
Rene Engelhard
Processed: tagging 1007049, tagging 1007084, tagging 1007061, tagging 1007085, tagging 1007086, tagging 1007081 ...
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#1053767: chromium: please to add support for s390x or armel
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
gcc-13 regression
Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Bug#1050220: mutter: autopkgtest regression on s390x: tests time out after 5 minutes
Simon McVittie
Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie
Moritz Mühlenhoff
Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie
Guillem Jover
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Matthew Wilcox
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Jeff Layton
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Dave Chinner
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Finn Thain
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Matthew Wilcox
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Finn Thain
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Theodore Ts'o
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Jeffrey Walton
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Matthew Wilcox
Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode
Linus Torvalds
Adduser/logger problems in s390x autopkgtest
Marc Haber
Re: Adduser/logger problems in s390x autopkgtest
Paul Wise
Bug#1038827: libwebm: Failed tests in big-endian architectures
Boyuan Yang
Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022
Simon McVittie
unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rob Landley
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rob Landley
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Kurt Roeckx
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Jan Engelhardt
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rob Landley
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Steve McIntyre
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Omer Turpault
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Adrian Bunk
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Jeffrey Walton
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Jeffrey Walton
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Adrian Bunk
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Adrian Bunk
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Kirsten Bromilow
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Rene Engelhard
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Rene Engelhard
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Adrian Bunk
Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)
Laurent Siksous
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Kurt Roeckx
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Kurt Roeckx
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Paul Wise
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Andreas Schwab
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Rene Engelhard
Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures
Jeffrey Walton
Help needed with tomopy/s390x
Roland Mas
Re: Help needed with tomopy/s390x
Dipak Zope1
[PATCH v3] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal
Sumanth Korikkar
[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal
Sumanth Korikkar
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal
Greg KH
Patch "[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
gregkh
[PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal
Sumanth Korikkar
[PATCH 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal
Sumanth Korikkar
Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal
Greg KH
Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal
Greg KH
Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal
Heiko Carstens
Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal
Greg KH
help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Philipp Kern
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Dipak Zope1
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Philipp Kern
RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Dipak Zope1
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Philipp Kern
RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Dipak Zope1
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Antonio Terceiro
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Philipp Kern
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Elizabeth K. Joseph
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Dipak Zope
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
James Addison
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
James Addison
Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Paul Gevers
Bug#1031022: Does not work on big endian machines
Enrico Zini
Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Otto Kekäläinen
Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Sebastian Ramacher
Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Andrew Hutchings
Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Otto Kekäläinen
RE: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Dipak Zope1
RE: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout)))
Dipak Zope1
suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x
Michael Tokarev
Re: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x
Dipak Zope1
Re: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x
Dipak Zope1
RE: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x
Dipak Zope1
libyang2 broken on big endian architectures
Marco d'Itri
LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Rene Engelhard
Is jpeg-xl blacklisted from s390x ?
Mathieu Malaterre
Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts?
Peter Pentchev
Re: Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts?
Peter Pentchev
Re: Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts?
Kurt Roeckx
Bug#1025532: ostree: often FTBFS on s390x: tests/test-sysroot.js:96: deploymentPath.query_exists(null) should be false
Simon McVittie
Bug#1024515: mariadb-10.6: FTBFS on s390x: test main.order_by_innodb failed with type 'ref'
Otto Kekäläinen
Bug#1024391: gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependency made border-image-excess-size reftest regress
Simon McVittie
Bug#1018939: zarr: autopkgtest regression on s390x
Graham Inggs
Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Michael Biebl
Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Paul Gevers
RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Dipak Zope1
RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Dipak Zope1
Re: Bug#1018224: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Michael Biebl
Re: Bug#1018224: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Paul Gevers
Re: RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Paul Gevers
Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x
Michael Biebl
Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x
Paul Gevers
Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x
Paul Gevers
Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x
Marc Haber
investigating unreproducible autopkgtest failure of atop on s390s
Marc Haber
help about build fail on s390 for rush package
Bo YU
libunwind: please update to new upstream (moved to github)
Graham Inggs
Bug#1014061: FTBFS on s390x: test suite failure when dumping a gif file
Michael Biebl
enabling link time optimizations in package builds
Matthias Klose
Re: enabling link time optimizations in package builds
Timo Röhling
Earlier messages