On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:56:46 +0100
Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that mean that xfce4 is a good compromise then between both of
> these concepts given you can install as many or as few of the
> components as you like once you have the basic libraries installed? ;)
Having been a loyal IceWM user since Potato was new I recently switched
to Xfce4 to see what it could do for me. Well, IceWM has /never/
crashed on me in all that time. Last week Xfce4 crashed on me five
times. Other than that, yes, it's a good compromise*.
I've gone back to the tried and true IceWM.
* Maybe that should be spelled, "/con/promise.
Cybe R. Wizard
--
Q: What's the difference between MicroSoft Windows and a virus?
A: Apart from the fact that viruses are supported by their authors,
use optimized, small code and usually perform well, none.
Winduhs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
