On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 06:45:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 22 May 1999 21:08:26 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote: > > >Wrong. If you use the multiple accounts support built into Communicator, > >you have seperate preferences, bookmarks, mail folders, etc. Try it out. > >It should do what you want.. > > No, that would be like logging into seperate accounts on Linux. No, all > accounts should be accessable from a single window/login AT THE SAME TIME. > Multiplexing multiple single account applications does not equal a single > application handling multiple accounts. > > - -- > Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your > ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. > - > -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc > > iQA/AwUBN0ddt3pf7K2LbpnFEQLp+ACg2yOJgLtdlAF8ripdviDYQXe4QFQAoKT6 > mD6M2gmanDq1gGpHWhbhKJhj > =URmG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >
Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator? It sounds to me like you've become so attached to this particular piece of software that you believe that you can't work any other way. Don't yell, I'm not responsible for your problems. In the past, Linux users faced with a problem have programmed around it. Thus, we have a dozen different window managers and a dozen different mail clients. But, now, we are faced with a new group of users that whine all day long, but don't lift a finger to solve the problem. What a shame! -- Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] webmaster - http://www.mschess.org