-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 22 May 1999 23:45:39 -0500, Stephen Pitts wrote:
>Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator? Then that wouldn't be a single application, would it? >It sounds to me like you've become so attached to this particular piece of >software that you believe that you can't work any other way. Oh, I know I can. But not as efficiently. >Don't yell, I'm not responsible for your problems. That wasn't yelling, that was emphasis for a point I knew you would miss. You are, in part, responisble for my problems. You are part of the crowd that keeps harping that *your* way is *the* way to the exclusion of all others. >In the past, Linux users faced with a problem have programmed around it. >Thus, we have a dozen different window managers and a dozen different mail >clients. But, now, we are faced with a new group of users that whine all day >long, but don't lift a finger to solve the problem. What a shame! New? I addressed that in the last message. I also addressed that I cannot program. Most people can't you know. I've also pointed out that I am not opposed to paying for others to program something I would like. That is why I have an offer up on the Software Bazaar and when that one is fulfilled I'll pay for more *OPEN SOURCE* development. - -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. - -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc iQA/AwUBN0eMpHpf7K2LbpnFEQJnmgCeLzjICSRac1z/1cW04TYl+GGWG04Aniau Q2UcRq063dsKbvVNFqwRxPWC =bTER -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----