-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:25:28PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > My only dislike of the above is courier-imap. It insists that all > > folders appear below "INBOX" (eg. "INBOX.trash") which in turn looks > > messy and prevents using a hierarchy for your own folders. > > Yeah, I agree, it's a bit dumb. I think it's less "it's a dumb IMAP server" and more "it's a dumb email client that doesn't let you set your mailbox path" (netscape calls it the "mail server directory"). Or the user does't realize such things are possible :) > The other thing with courier is that, due to the way it's laid out, I > imagine that it'd be a bastard to get anything like FHS compliance. The > way it installs itself offends my sense of aesthetics. Compiling it from the source distribution does that. The Debian package is fairly FHS compliant (I'm using courier-imap-1.2 from unstable, compiled many moons ago on a potato system). > Other than that, it seems pretty stable though. Let's put it this way: It's light-years ahead of the competition (UofW IMAP, in this case). - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC GPG key id: 50DE1CFC GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6Z7///ZTSZFDeHPwRAitnAJ477fp+jYkl6cba//Pf+Mbs41H4ugCdGHGx iLksMZqCyxEWqTG+t7y0RWc= =TT0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----