On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:27:13PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:52:27AM -0500, ktb wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote: > > > Bud Rogers wrote: > > > > > > > Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was > > > > not previously common or even not so common. We're talking about a > > > > practice that was virtually unknown until Microsoft flooded the market > > > > with badly broken mail and news clients that make it very difficult to > > > > properly quote or attribute anything. > > > > > > True. In this situation, I wouldn't use the word "deprecated". I would > > > just say that putting one's reply above the original message makes one > > > look like an idiot. > > > > I like that...lol. I remember when I first started using linux I posted > > to some list, probably this one. I wanted to know how to set Netscape > > mail to default, like outlook, to appending my text to the top of the > > message. You can imagine what response I got:D > > kent > > > Did they tell you cannot "append" something before something else.. > (just teasing)
Got me .... :) Lets start another definition thread. Kidding....just....kidding:) kent -- "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein