also sprach Robert Waldner (on Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:01:26AM +0200): > Not to give NT any honour, but that´s probably FW-1. It runs reasonably > (for commercial-firewall-software - values of) stable on AIX, Solaris and > Debian, but the NT-port is...utter crap.
well, that's probably true. but how can you port potentially good software (i can't quite classify fw-1 as good, but it is a good start) to a visual patch to a useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. ever done MFC programming? or windoze API for that sake? aaaaaaaah! > The Policy Editor, OTOH, is quite nice. sure, but there are better. i forgot the name of the one i have in mind, i'll post it tomorrow from the office. martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/