On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:38:55PM -0500, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: | * Rino Mardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: | > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: | > > * Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: | > > > will trillich wrote: | > > > | > > > > $ uptime | > > > > 12:44am up 365 days, 1:31, 2 users, load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01 | > > > > | > > > > break out the root beer! | > > > | > > > Congrats! I think I'll show this to a few Windows users. | > > | > > Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1]. | > > The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had | > > to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's | > > how you use it... | > > | > so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the | > unbelievable uptime? don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the | > figures | | We didn't run luser apps on it, except Access (well, DAO, actually). Other | than that it was serving files 24/7. And it was NT _server_, not WS.
The difference bewteen server and workstation is a couple registry keys and the price tag. :-) -D