On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:59:30AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > yes I recieved the message to, but of course I did not send it. The > > To: header for that thing was huge, as colin pointed out it was sent > > to the list members off list, it did not come through the debian mail > > system. > > And that, for Colin Watson's benefit, is why the address I'm using for this > email doesn't accept mail that has not gne through Debian.
You're entitled to your opinion, but in my personal opinion sticking to that policy means you shouldn't file bug reports. I don't think undeliverable submitter addresses on bugs are acceptable. Sorry. If you accepted mail to the relevant [EMAIL PROTECTED] address, and warned readers of the bug report about this, then that would still be irritating but might be marginally acceptable. (Not speaking as a BTS admin, just as a maintainer who has been *very* irritated by Disappearing Submitter Syndrome in the past.) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]