On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Tom Cook wrote: > Why is it *so* hard to build a browser that is > > (a) Standards compliant > (b) Small > (c) Fast > (d) Extensible (so you can look at all-flash sites if you want)
I'll make an observation: Pick three. Your selection will be mutually exclusive to the remaining option. > People just don't seem able to do it. Micro$oft can't, Netscape can't, > Sun had a go at it, KDE is closeish, galeon seems not ideal... They're > all slow, or have strange foibles, or won't display > java/flash/pdf/name-your-poison or just plain segfault every three > minutes like the good 'ol nutscrape versions (as one of my colleagues > refers to them). What gives? Mozilla is standards compliant, fast, and extensible. -- Baloo