>>"Jaldhar" == Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jaldhar> Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> And it is my right to fight tooth and nail to prevent debian >> from sliding into censorship, since that makes debian worse. >> Jaldhar> While all this bickering was going on, the maintainer did Jaldhar> actually remove the offensive bit. Yes. Upstream seems to have admitted that this particular case was an oversight. Jaldhar> So the censorship has already occurred. Look at the definition of the word. Since the author (and the maintainer have retracted the message, your use of the word censor is, umm, mostly inflammatory. Jaldhar> If Manoj is serious about "fighting tooth and nail" (and not Jaldhar> just trying to score debating points as I suspect,) he has Jaldhar> the same choice convince the maintainer, fork the package or Jaldhar> shut up. Thank you. I did not think I needed instruction in how the project operated, but thanks. And you should really read what you respond to, and try not to quote things out of context. What I actually said was: Manoj> And it is my right to fight tooth and nail to prevent debian Manoj> from sliding into censorship, since that makes debian worse. Indeed, if you read the context I was speaking in, I was defending the right of people to voice their opinions in this debate. In this particular case (which really interests me little), the situation has been resolved. My concern is the so called calls for policy >> After all, I tolerate the bible, and the dhamapada. And such >> superstition is far more insidious than racism. >> Jaldhar> The really insidious thing about these debates is the vapid Jaldhar> philosophizing that goes on... I see. Any philosophizing that is not done ny you, or meets your parameters, is now bland? Jaldhar> My view is very simple. There are no facts in such cases Jaldhar> just subjective opinions so the subjective opinion of he who Jaldhar> does the work is the only one that counts. I suppose this is far less trite and banal than all the other people philosophizing on the subject, despite the putative simplicity. One bows to the master. manoj -- Where is John Carson now that we need him? RLG Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C