I have had my suspicions about the existence of some such thing, but being no expert on M$ (I was an OS/2 user before Linux), I have not been sure where to look. I shall go looking for it (my kids' machine will run Win98 for up to an hour before it GPFs). :-)
Thank you, sir Cam * Paul 'Baloo' Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Cam Ellison wrote: > > > To the best of my knowledge, they do not. It is difficult for me to > > actually get into each of the machines in question and play around, > > since they are some distance away (anywhere from 40 km across a large > > body of water to 600 km over the mountains). The headers do not > > appear in the respective Inbox displays, and I must assume that they > > are either rejected (given a 554 code, perhaps) or sent to /dev/null > > after retrieval. > > Back from my tech support days, I vaguely remember an option in OE that > allows OE to silently drop "potentially harmful" attachments and is on > by default...curious what happens if the recipient shuts this feature > off? This shouldn't make a difference in the security of the box, as > they're running an up to date virus package (right?). > > - -- > Baloo > > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE85KiuNtWkM9Ny9xURAmleAKCUbUNPIEqpHVyNQEYVbhFofWXDoQCfUQHI > 1bxCI9cCToCv5p3oOsHa9pg= > =ypyb > > -- Cam Ellison Ph.D. R.Psych. From Roberts Creek on B.C.'s incomparable Sunshine Coast [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]