Digby Tarvin wrote: > So what puzzles me is why it is no longer in 'non-free', and if > it was removed because of some objection to the licensing terms, > surely there should be something documenting this?
It may have been removed simply because no one was willing to maintain it any more. That often happens when a non-free package ceases to provide any functionality not available in a Free package. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]