>To be blunt... -Fail- >That is not what I have suggested what so ever in any way shape or form. > >I could re-explain but I won't... you just wasted 8 reading paragraphs >of my life listening to you arguing against a suggestion I didn't make. > >Please re-read what I suggested in my -original- message and not the one >with the highlights for the other person that totally misunderstood the
>purpose of original message. OK. I will. I quote from your original email: "If we had Alpha releases, say 'lenny-alpha1' release at a point where there's no major block/crash-like problems being caused then people could download that milestone release. 'lenny-alpha1' could then not update until 'lenny-alpha2' is released" Sounds like you want to have pre-stable release to me. It's called a Release Candidate. I still see no reason to have separate releases or stages within testing. I think it is more trouble then it is worth for the developers. Chris Stackpole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]