Stefan's suggestion is interesting, but I know pretty much nothing about the Law: I am doing (CS) engineering studies!
Monique Y. Mudama wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21 at 15:04, Stefan Monnier penned: > > > Except that most technical people would probably rather hammer a nail > through their forehead than go through the pain of suing someone and > dealing with the legal system, the paper work, the time involved ... > And the financial (and social) cost of such paper work and investigations. > So looking for a technical solution, even one that requires an > enormous amount of development time, makes sense. Maybe the > development time is actually a bonus, if you're interested in that > sort of tinkering already. > True. > All of that being said - this entire thread is really a question of > security, and security is a process and an approach, not an end result. > There is no such thing as a 100% secure system that is also useful, in > the same way that there is no such thing as a 100% secure PDF that is > also useful. So the real goal is to make the document "secure enough" > for one's purposes, while also making the document "usable enough" for > those purposes. I think there have been a lot of good ideas on this > thread for managing that trade-off. > Yes. Your relevant remark should conclude the thread. -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail client, please contact me. Procrastination is the thief of time.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
