On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:21 PM, shawn wilson <ag4ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2011 3:28 PM, "prad" <p...@towardsfreedom.com> wrote: > > > > prad <p...@towardsfreedom.com> writes: > > > > > are there any feelings or recommendations regarding the above? > > > > > one possibility i forgot to ask about is zfs using debian/freebsd. > > i understand that zfs works well with freebsd, so presumably it would > > with debian/freebsd as well. > > > > i'm curious as to feelings on this combo vs xfs with straight debian > > (which is really what we are leaning to) as we start our research on the > > matter. > > > > Read the kernel docs. It's still unstable as hell on linux IIRC. > You also need to take into account that CDDL (The Sun/Oracle Licence) is not compatible with the GNU Licence, so there are legal issues as well (see the ZFS link I initially posted a few days ago.) The whole point of the rewrite project is to have a native (in-kernel) solution that is legally compatible as well as stable (which it's not right now.) -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
