on Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:20:34PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Karsten M. Self said: > > on Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:03:47PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I've received far more invalid, than valid, C-R challenges. This is > > simply spam by another name. > > > > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Rants/challenge-response.html > > > > ...also discussed at some length in d-u last month. > > > > Since I posted this I've read the whole challenge and response (C-R) > thread and updated myself on some of the content on your site including > the aforementioned link. I won't be seeing Morgan Stanley lawyers about > bouncing email at them because I don't bounce email. I stop it at SMTP. Good to hear, I think. Properly implemented, C-R is only annoying and of nondeterminate effectiveness. Improperly implemented, it is not merely spam, but a DDoS tool. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? GNU/Linux & BSD: We *are* the way out. http://www.wehadthewayout.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
