On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:55:47 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Camaleón: >> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:20:10 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote: >> > On 03/04/12 19:21, Camaleón wrote: >> (...) >> >> >>> "Ulterior" is certainly not a synonym for "posterior", >> >> >> >> But it was, that's what I meant. It's not a term I would neither use >> >> in my own language but it is still perfectly correct. >> > >> > Maybe, but you wouldn't pass for a native speaker, and that's what >> > this is all about, isn't it? If I'm wrong about that, then all bets >> > are off; use whatever word takes your fancy! >> >> (...) >> >> Well, I somehow disagree with that. > > I am certainly tempted to make a screenshot of the view of this thread > here in KMail, upload it somewhere and put a link here.
No need for all that work. You can get the big picture here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/04/threads.html#00193 > You aren´t still discussing some wording in Releasenotes or other > documentation, aren´t you? You read and you'll find out. > I might try whether KMail handles ignoring this thread. It sometimes > seems to work at other times mails in the thread are still marked as > new. This thread was (properly) tagged as "OT" and thus can be easily ignored/ filtered/avoided by anyone. Move on. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jljtuj$mrm$3...@dough.gmane.org