On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:08:41 -0400 Gary Dale <garyd...@torfree.net> wrote:
> Whatever for? There are better checksums and md5 doesn't provide error > correction? Even the MD5 man page advises using sha checksums instead. md5sum provides a relatively quick check... if it fails, then use the "real" check, i.e. pars. This saves [or seems to save] computing resources... However, it was just a suggestion... --Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140809162033.bdf0a3999e75e47c9408a...@1024bits.com
