Brian wrote:
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 21:47:45 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Brian wrote:
I'd suggest that the principal udeb package to consider as responsible
for installing the base system is bootstrap-base. It runs debootstrap.
Debian Policy specifies the base packages as being of Priority: required
and Priority: important.
actually, after looking at some more installer documentation
(http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/ch02.html) - I'm
thinking it's more likely to be the base-installer package
bootstrap-base has the package description 'Install the base system' and
depends on base-installer. An installer log has
Oct 7 16:48:43 main-menu[190]: INFO: Menu item 'bootstrap-base' selected
followed by debootstrap installing the base system. An example is
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: Preparing to unpack
.../archives/init_1.21_i386.deb ...
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: dpkg: regarding .../archives/init_1.21_i386.deb
containing init, pre-dependency problem:
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: init pre-depends on systemd-sysv |
sysvinit-core | upstart
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: systemd-sysv is not installed.
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: sysvinit-core is not installed.
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: upstart is not installed.
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap:
Oct 7 16:49:33 debootstrap: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
Ahhh... Thanks.
Miles
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543fc938.5040...@meetinghouse.net
