Le Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:08:48 +0000, Martin Read <zen75...@zen.co.uk> a écrit :
> On 16/11/14 17:33, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Are you aware that this is the approach that systemd and upstart > > have taken, right? > > > > 1) Both systemd (PID1) and upstart are drop-in replacement for the > > good old SysVinit as they both support the common "standard" that > > are LSB scripts (A really good share of the existing LSB > > initscripts in the debian archive are just working out of the box). > > Well. They're (mostly) a drop-in replacement for sysvrc and its > supporting tools. They're certainly not a *drop-in* replacement for > *sysvinit*, because they don't support all of sysvinit's interfaces; > specifically, they don't support /etc/inittab. > > Luckily (for some values of lucky), /etc/inittab was such a terrible > interface (it's unpleasantly reminiscent of Angband's monster, item, > etc. databases) that it seems even most people who prefer sysvinit to > systemd or upstart were using a factory-default /etc/inittab. Note that there were plans to either abort systemd-sysv installation or at least display a big fat warning in case /etc/inittab was modified on the machine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141116194032.38ec5...@fornost.bigon.be
