On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with > > tentacles. > > (Do cancers actually have tentacles??). > > It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is. Read Lennart's own blog > if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down. > > I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not > optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not > have systemd. Not that I would support any version with systemd, but > some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort. > > > I gather Devuan is doing well. So there are choices. One of course is > > stick > > with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such > > distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." > > And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto. Renaming is just hiding > the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.
Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian. >From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd. -- Bob Holtzman A fair fight is the result of poor planning.