On Monday 07 September 2015 20:09:12 Bob Holtzman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > > On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with > > > tentacles. (Do cancers actually have tentacles??). > > > > It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is. Read Lennart's own blog > > if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down. > > > > I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not > > optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not > > have systemd. Not that I would support any version with systemd, but > > some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort. > > > > > I gather Devuan is doing well. So there are choices. One of course is > > > stick with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names > > > cause such distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." > > > > And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto. Renaming is just hiding > > the facts or at least making them harder to be seen. > > Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.
If that is addressed at me, yes. Reread it more slowly. > > >From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd. Yes. Lisi