On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:05:26AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > On 8/09/2015 5:09 AM, Bob Holtzman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > >> On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >>> I gather Devuan is doing well. So there are choices. One of course is > >>> stick > >>> with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such > >>> distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." > > ... this bit "A rose....", see further below. > > >> And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto. Renaming is just hiding > >> the facts or at least making them harder to be seen. > > > > Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian. > >>From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd. > > Oh no, I wasn't meaning anything to do with Devuan; Lisi mentioned about > renaming systemd related parts, my view is that this would just mask the > fact that it is systemd, in effect an attempt to mislead the users as to > the real facts. > > Devuan is very admirable, great work by them.
Yup, I did misread it! -- Bob Holtzman A fair fight is the result of poor planning.
