Reco: > So, sooner or later, money come into play (aren't they always do?). The > important thing here for me is 'who pays', not 'who gets paid'.
I mostly agree with your analysis but here I would add to the "who pays", "why are they paying" and "what exactly are they paying for" .... In most cases the last is so a (single), or a few corporations, can control a market, a monopoly or oligopoly is founded, and in some cases to be allowed to do so they have to serve "other interests" that are not readily explained with financial interests alone. The bad sometimes are in silent synergy with the evil, but they can improve their image by donating and sponsoring "the good". Eventually the good end up depending on this sponsorship for existence. This is the ultimate control and blackmail, and that justifies blindly serving the interests of all evil. > Reco Yes, what are we to change things, but at least we should be able to freely talk about it, in case a way is discovered. -- "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG "Who died and made you the superuser?" Brooklinux "keep rocking in the non-free world" Neilznotyoung