On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 07:55:05 -0400 Carl Fink <ca...@panix.com> wrote: > For years, my policy has been to use stable on servers and testing > on workstations.
For servers i'ts pretty much clear, but in regard to testing vs unstable this was decisive part for me: "Testing has more up-to-date software than Stable, and it breaks less often than Unstable. But when it breaks, it might take a long time for things to get rectified. Sometimes this could be days and it could be months at times. It also does not have permanent security support." (https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-choosing.html) Sincerely, Gour -- Abandoning all attachment to the results of his activities, ever satisfied and independent, he performs no fruitive action, although engaged in all kinds of undertakings.