On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 20:33:12 +0100, Joe wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:07:36 +0100 > Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Ease up? Perhaps. > > > > The "in general" is interesting and informative. Suppose the USPS, > > Royal Mail or Deutsche Post etc decided the point of origin or the > > destination for a mail was a criterion in their delivery policy? What > > a world we would live in then! But the email world gaily goes about > > deciding who sends or gets email in the name of spam fighting. > > > > The epitomy of this is the discrimination against dynamic addresses. > > Want to be a mail second class citizen on the Net? Easy; don't have a > > static address. Want to be homeless and send or receive a letter - > > Royal Mail will not stop you. Email is a solution which has been > > turned into a toy communication system. > > > > Are you saying that we all have a duty to accept spam and viruses from > every bot and spammer on the planet?
"a duty"? Don't be silly. Address the point. -- Brian.