On Thu 25 Feb 2021 at 09:30:13 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 02/25/2021 09:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote: > > On 2021-02-25 at 10:02, Michael Howard wrote: > > > On 25/02/2021 14:55, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > On 02/25/2021 08:41 AM, James B wrote: > > > > > > > > > Browsh was reviewed in one of the linux magazines recently.It > > > > > uses firefox behind the scenes and renders the pages to ASCII for > > > > > display in a terminal, which is a novel approach.I've tried it > > > > > and it works well.. > > > > > > > > > > https://www.brow.sh/ > > > > > > > > Maybe later. It isn't in repository and depends on Firefox. I'm > > > > strongly pro-SeaMonkey ;} > > > > > > Err, where do think SeaMonkey evolved from? > > > > As far as I'm aware, it's a lineal descendant of the Mozilla Suite, just > > as Firefox and Thunderbird are - although, again AFAIK, only Firefox is > > still an official Mozilla product. > > > > I date from era of Netscape Navigator.
Oh dear, the young upstart that killed off NCSA Mosaic! BTW I'm a fan of ^A ^C and pasting the result into a buffer. It has the advantage of: showing the formatting of the original page showing the bits of the page that look like text but aren't really so¹, and are therefore missed by lynx et al. in the browser's display. ¹ ^A doesn't change them to inverse-video. Cheers, David.
