On Sun 19 Mar 2023 at 19:36:47 (+0800), Jeremy Ardley wrote: > On 19/3/23 19:29, Jeremy Ardley wrote: > > > > In this case of the /24 it gave an answer I expected. I imagine it > > will take a trawl of the RFC and then of actual implementations to > > find out for sure. > > > > The best description of the AI is it is informative but not authorative. > > > Checking the RFC. To my reading the final stanza is not checked > > " The <ip> is compared to the given network. If CIDR prefix length > > high-order bits match, the mechanism matches." > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7208#section-5.6 > > So in this case AI got it right.
I don't follow. What's your "final stanza" referring to, and what's wrong with the RFC in connection with it? Cheers, David.
