On 2023-03-20 07:36, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
As for the RFC? It's precise and definitive. My only concern is that some mail system implementer may 'improve' the RFC and restrict the acceptable address range to a /32 when they see a non zero final qnum in a /24
me second. 192.168.1.1/24 just makes me confused with 192.168.1.1/32 which is a real host address. for block address it should be clearly 192.168.1.0/24.
Thanks Corey H
