Andy Smith wrote: > This whole thing just seems like the normal process of developing > and packaging a distribution. Poor interactions are found, reported, > hopefully will be fixed. But once again there's people trying to use > this as a daily driver and having weird expectations. And then some > sort of triggering around anything involving systemd. > > I feel like we see it more and more, these expectations about sid, > and I don't understand why.
There are people who have become invested in the idea that sid is "stable enough" and have been told that it is comparable to a rolling release model. They have been misinformed but seem resistant to correction. -dsr-
