Re: systemd may silently break your system!

[George at Clug]

On Friday, 02-08-2024 at 02:39 Dan Ritter wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote: 
> > This whole thing just seems like the normal process of developing
> > and packaging a distribution. Poor interactions are found, reported,
> > hopefully will be fixed. But once again there's people trying to use
> > this as a daily driver and having weird expectations. And then some
> > sort of triggering around anything involving systemd.
> > 
> > I feel like we see it more and more, these expectations about sid,
> > and I don't understand why.
> 
> There are people who have become invested in the idea that sid
> is "stable enough" and have been told that it is comparable to a
> rolling release model.
> 
> They have been misinformed but seem resistant to correction.

+1

Thank you for confirming my suspicions. 

Due to the number of people running sid as a daily driver, I was starting to 
doubt my original understanding 'testing!=stable".

 

George.

> 
> -dsr-
> 
>