On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:39:12AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > The DFSG says *nothing* about "functional parts", and was recently > amended *specifically* to clarify that the same conditions apply to > software and programs.
I have never objected this decision. > To interpret the DFSG to read into it language about functional parts > or to have different standards for programs and documentation, is to > insert something that is simply not there. I do not interpret DFSG that way. If I decide to create a package with some essays from www.gnu.org that package would be free acording to FSF and non-free acording to DFSG (because these essays are not modifiable). I have no problems with that. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]