On 28/10/08 at 13:07 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Do you propose to drop the immediate vote, but keep the fact the > > decision is put on hold according to 4.2.2.2, until the final vote on > > this GR ? > > That is exactly what he proposed in a different email in this thread. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, that's not exactly what he proposed. In that message, Joerg writes: > As I already explained none of this is implemented yet. None of this > will be implemented within the next few weeks. So he justifies that nothing will happen within the next few weeks because there's the need to implement some changes first (in dak, nm.d.o, etc). This is very different from saying that nothing will happen because the decision is on hold under 4.2.2.2. If Joerg suddenly got a lot of free time, he could implement all the changes quickly and start giving DME/DC statuses to people. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
